"Aurora - Flight of Fancy?" 

This article written by the author of this site Geoff Richardson 

Aurora - Flight of Fancy was published in EYE magazine

Aurora"We heard Aurora two days in a row - you can almost feel it beating against your chest more than you actually hear it - you feel the pulsation on your body. It's like one of the lowest notes on a pipe organ, about thirty-two cycles per second. Once you have heard it you will never forget it, it's very low and very, very loud. Bob Lazar told me he had seen it - he was on a bus with opaque windows when he first heard it ". So spoke Area 51 observer Walt Andrews , describing his encounter with a mystical hypersonic craft developed by Lockheed and flight tested at Area 51 - reputedly the home of crashed or captured UFOs and reverse engineering.
According to Ben Goodall ,an Andrews' co-observer, "I called Ben Rich (the former head of Lockheed's top secret development site - Skunk Works) just before he died and he told me he was disappointed in the mach 12 Aurora because of it's incredible fuel consumption (liquid methane)".

Chuck Clark, who replaced Glenn Campbell as Arch expert on all things Area 51, claims to have seen Aurora, remarking "I even saw Aurora taking off one night in February 1994 and I managed to videotape it through a telescope with a five hundred millimeter f4 lens coupled via a c-ring to a high-eight digital video camera with five hundred and twenty scan lines and that is better than T.V." Clark also remarked that when the Military reveal the existence of the craft his video tape will also be revealed - until then it is in safe keeping.
However, Aurora has not only been seen in the wastelands of Nevada but, in effect, in many other parts of the World. A spate of sightings of dark triangular craft over Belgium in the late 1980s was explained away as the U.S. Military testing their newTop secret aircraft. Initially described as stealth but when this was obviously not so , Aurora provided an ideal solution. Another wave of sightings (this time Boomerang shaped craft) in the Hudson Valley resulted in similar opinions being expressed.

Web sites appeared on the Internet dedicated to Aurora - artistic impressions of this elusive craft became available and it is also alleged that R.A.F. Machrihanish in Scotland (regarded by some as the U.K.'s Area 51) is hosting the hypersonic craft.
Indeed, Aurora has been test flown over the North Sea , along the East coast of the U.K. in 1989 - according to a qualified witness.
But just what caused the initial interest in this fascinating aircraft? The original reference to Aurora was a censor's error in a military budget relating to a request for production funding in 1985 - some person with a very observant eye picked it up and the quest began.
But apart from the investigations and observations made by apparent UFO experts, who else could possibly throw some light on the matter? Is there any other source of reference to who we can look for definitive evidence regarding the reality of Aurora? Perhaps the man himself Ben R. Rich - the former head of Lockheed's Skunk Works - had something to say in the matter.

In his book - Skunk Works (Warner Books) - Ben Rich writes, " A young colonel working in the Air Force "black program" office at the Pentagon, named Buzz Carpenter , arbitrarily assigned the code name "Aurora" to an article of funding . Somehow this name leaked out during congressional appropriation hearings, the media picked up the Aurora item in the budget, and the rumor surfaced that it was a top secret project assigned to the Skunk Works - to build a hypersonic plane. That story persists to this day even though Aurora was the code name for the B2 competition funding. Although I expect few in the media to believe me, there is no code name for the hypersonic plane, because it simply does not exist".
Words that have "the ring of truth"! No wonder that, after almost twenty years, all we have are artistic impressions of this hypersonic craft. The concept of an incredibly powerful, fast aircraft linked to Area 51 and the possibility of reverse engineering is indeed a fascinating subject -but in the case of Aurora a futile one.
But has this endless and futile search for the mythical Aurora caused any harm?

Of course it has - the subject of Ufology is difficult and complex enough without the addition of false and time consuming information. The regular sightings of "Black Triangles ", for instance, can easily be explained away - "it must have been Aurora". Even though Black Triangles have capabilities that are very much outside our current technological envelope - it is easy and convenient to make Aurora " fit the bill".
Also, the hours spent in researching, hypothesizing and writing about Aurora must be incalculable. Not least the false statements made by some relating to Ben Rich and his true remarks regarding hypersonic craft.hypersonic craft
It must be difficult for researchers who have mistakenly invested years of effort into a "non-existent" subject to accept the fact that it was futile but perhaps when they do Ufology will take a step closer to the truth.

Artistic impression of Aurora - a hypersonic craft that has never existed!

Thanks to Chris Evers for the following item. Chris is the Co-editor of EYE magazine (see links)"

On March 6, 1990, one of the United States Air Force's sleek, matte black Lockheed SR - 71 Blackbird spy planes, serial number 6417972, shattered the official air speed record from Los Angeles to Washington's Dulles airport. There, a brief snow dusted ceremony marked the end of the SR - 71's operational career, as the record - breaking craft was handed over to the National Air and Space Museum. Officially, the SR - 71 was being retired to save the $200 - $300 million a year that it cost to operate the fleet. Some reporters were told that the SR - 71 had been declared redundant because spy satellites had improved so much that the aircraft was no longer needed. But there was something badly wrong with the picture: not only was the Air Force, from chief of staff Gen. Lawrence Welch on down, declining opposition to end it's most glamorous manned aircraft mission, but it also was discouraging congressional attempts to revive it. Never in it's history had the Air Force - owned and operated by the pilot community - walked away from a manned mission, however mundane, without a fight. 

The money was also an issue; $300 million is a lot to most of us, but it is chicken feed to the Pentagon. Specifically, it is well under 7 percent of what the Pentagon spends each year on reconnaissance satellites. If the SR - 71s served no other purpose than that of an emergency backup, in case of an unlucky string of satellite and launcher failures, they would be cheap insurance. The missing piece in this puzzle, and a number of other's, is a spy plane called Aurora. The outside world uses that name because a censors slip let it appear below the SR - 71 and the U - 2 in the 1985 Pentagon budget request, attached to a budget line that called for production funds in 1987. Even if that was the projects real name - which is not certain - it was almost certainly changed after being compromised in such a manner. 

The plane's real name has been kept secret, and so is the fact that it exists. The project is what is technically known as an unacknowledged Special Access Program (SAP). More often, such projects are called "black programmes". The Pentagons "black world," within such programmes are conducted, is not a separate secret military force. It is more like a loose underground network, distributed throughout the services and other Pentagon agencies. It's size can be gauged from the Pentagon's unclassified budget documents, which include correct total and summary figures but which conceal individual programmes by mentioning them only by code name or by lumping them together under generic, meaningless titles. 

In the Pentagon's budget request for fiscal year 1993, the black budget - expenditures masked in this way - amounted to a staggering $16 billion for research, development, and production of secret programmes. That constitutes 17 percent of the Pentagon's entire budget for R&D and production, and exceeds the budget of most Western nations. 
To see the black world in action, you can trek through the Nevada desert to a mountainside overlooking the dry Groom Lake. From several miles away - as close as you can get without entering restricted government lands - you can see through the persistent haze a large flight - test centre. It resembles Edward's Air Force Base, California, with a sprawling collection of hangars of many different sizes and styles, scattered by the edge of a six - mile runway. Officially, the Groom Lake complex - also known as Area 51 - does not exist. Even a Lockheed paper published last year on the early days of the U - 2, which refers to tests completed at Area 51, 35 years ago, refers to it as "a remote location." Comparing today's Groom Lake with ground level photographs taken in the late 1970's, it is apparent that many of the largest buildings were added in the following decade.

This site is very active: always visible in recent photograph's are a flotilla of Boeing 737's that bring the work force to Groom from the places were they live, and where their friends and family think they work - such as Palmdale, Burbank, or Edward's in California, or Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada. Groom Lake has another unusual feature: a lake - bed runway that is six miles long, or twice the length of other normal runways in the United States. Going back to the basics, the length of a runway is determined either by the distance an aircraft needs to accelerate to flying speed or the distance that an aircraft needs to decelerate after landing. That distance is proportional to the speed at which lift off takes place; usually, ultra long runways mean aircraft with very high minimum flying speeds, and - as is the case at Edward's - these are aircraft that are optimised for very high maximum speeds. Almost 19,000 feet of the runway is paved for routine operations. But the Air Force continues to deny that the Aurora, or any high - speed project, is among the secrets that it hides in the Nevada desert.

Questioned about Aurora in the fall of 1992, former US Air Force Secretary Donald B. Rice cast doubt on "the kind of descriptions laid out in some of those articles [which] would take an aircraft of such proportions and capabilities that there wouldn't be a snowballs chance in you know where of hiding it." Air Force security cut its teeth on the Lockheed U - 2 spy plane, the first US aircraft to be kept secret at the time it entered service. There were, however, some problems. The U - 2 used daylight cameras and therefore operated during daylight hours. In its original form, it could not be refuelled in flight, and had to be based in allied nations on the periphery of the former Soviet Union in order to reach its targets. The U - 2 attracted attention the moment it arrived at RAF Lakenheath in the United Kingdom.

 In an uncanny foreshadowing of the Aurora story, a sketch of "the mysterious stranger" made by a British spotter appeared in the London based publication Flight. The USAF finally acknowledged that the aircraft was a Lockheed U - 2, and released pictures of one of the models in fake National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) markings to bolster the story that it was engaged in high - altitude atmospheric research. But it did not take much intelligence to wonder why such an aircraft should be kept secret, or why such an aircraft should be kept secret, or why it should have a designation in the utility category - previously used for chunky, 200 mile per hour (mph) de Havilland Canada Otter transport. Security did a better job next time. The U - 2's intended replacement was Lockheed's giant CL - 400, code named Suntan. The Mach 2.5 aircraft was powered by totally new air - turbo ramjet (ATR) engines burning liquid hydrogen. Pratt & Whitney carved a completely new facility out of the Florida Everglades to build and test the engine, and Lockheed virtually completed the first four aircraft before Suntan was cancelled due to technical snags in 1958.

 Not one word leaked out about Suntan until twenty years later, when Lockheed started talking about liquid hydrogen as a future aircraft fuel. Suntan, which had been sponsored by the USAF, was replaced by a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) project for kerosene - fuelled Mach 3 aircraft, called Gusto. After Lockheed was selected to build the aircraft, in September 1959, Gusto was renamed Oxcart. Lockheed's initial design was called the A - 11, and featured a pencil slim forward fuselage. As design work progressed, the drawings were modified to reduce radar reflectivity: in particular broad chines were added to the fuselage. With these changes, the aircraft that flew in April 1962 was called the A - 12. Secrecy was paramount, and Groom Lake - which had been temporarily abandoned after the U - 2 was declassified - was rebuilt into a fully equipped base that would support not only the A - 12 flight - tests but also the CIA's twelve operational aircraft. The A - 12 was designed to be inherently more secure than the U - 2 because it could refuel in flight and was therefore much less restricted in its use of bases. There were some close calls. On an early test flight, an A - 12 was refuelling from a tanker when a commercial jet cruised by, only a few thousand feet away. Government officials met the flight when it landed, briefly detained the passengers, and warned them to say nothing about anything they might have seen. On another occasion, a couple in a light aircraft got lost and landed at the first suitable airfield, which just happened to be Groom Lake, "We scared the hell out of them and sent them on their way," recalls a former Lockheed engineer. 

In May 1963, one of the A - 12s crashed near Wendover, Utah. The wreckage was cleaned up, witnesses were asked to sign security agreements, and the press was told that an F - 105 had crashed. Nevertheless, the plane's existence was an almost complete surprise when President Lyndon Johnson announced its existence in February 1964. The news sparked off a flurry of speculation, but many years passed before it was realised that Johnson's statement was - to use the elegant expression once used in court by a British civil servant - "economical with the truth." Johnson called the aircraft the A - 11, although the A - 11 had never been built, and said that "the A - 11 aircraft now at Edward's AFB are undergoing extensive tests to determine their capabilities as long - range interceptors." In fact, the USAF had ordered a development of the A - 12, called the YF - 12, as an interceptor, and two of them were undergoing tests at Groom Lake. But there were no A - 11s, or A - 12s, or YF - 12s at Edward's and never had been. In order to keep the verifiable facts consistent with the president's statement, the YF - 12s were rushed to Edward's and - since the plan view of the aircraft was still secret - immediately placed into hangars. They were still so hot from their supersonic dash that they triggered the fire sprinkler system in the hangar, drenching the reception committee. The Air Force had also ordered thirty examples of the RS - 71, a reconnaissance strike air plane, developed from the YF - 12, designed to assess damage after a nuclear attack and to destroy with nuclear weapons any targets that had escaped the first attack. 

In December, 1964, Johnson revealed the existence of the aircraft, but called it the SR - 71 Blackbird. Allegedly, it was a misreading, but the official designation of the aircraft was changed to SR (strategic reconnaissance) and the fact that the aircraft could have been developed easily to carry weapons was not alluded to until the early 1980s. But the CIA's A - 12s remained secret, despite the fact that by 1965 there were 1,800 people working at Groom Lake. By the end of that year the aircraft was declared ready for operation. In May 1967, A - 12s were deployed to Kadena Air Base, in Okinawa, to conduct regular flights over North Vietnam and some over North Korea. They continued to do so until mid - 1968, when the CIA A - 12 unit was deactivated, the aircraft were placed in secure storage at Palm dale and the mission was assumed - for reasons of economy - by the USAF's SR - 71s. Although the A - 12s had been flying regularly out of Kadena, their existence went unnoticed. So did that of a companion programme to the A - 12. This was the D - 21 ramjet - powered reconnaissance drone, designed to be launched at Mach 3 from the back of an A - 12, with the almost unbelievable range of more than 10,000 miles at Mach 3.8. The D - 21 became operational in 1970, but was retired in 1972, for political and technical reasons after $2 billion had been spent. A few years later, some of the D - 21s were photographed in open storage at Davis Monthan AFB, Arizona, but the Air Force released scant details of them and implied that they were developed as test vehicles or target drones. The D - 21s were later placed in a secure area and their existence went unreported. The A - 12s were kept indoors at Palm dale, California, for ten years. The USAF had lost several SR - 71s in the early years of the program, and it was felt that the A - 12s might be needed for spares. In April, 1982, twenty five years after the first flight, the existence of the A - 12 was declassified. The D - 21 was revealed at the same time, but nothing was said about its capabilities, its development history is still officially classified. 

Before April 1982, the existence of the A - 12 had been intentionally concealed for twenty - three years, despite flying operational missions out of non - secure bases, through a combination of security, cover stories, and misleading information. The ultimate irony is that the security measures had little effect on their intended target. The soviet Union's intelligence services were well aware that the A - 12 existed as early as 1960, MiG chief designer Belyakov revealed in a 1991 book; the MiG - 25 Mach 3 fighter was designed to counter the A - 12, not as CIA leaks suggested in the late 1970s - the already moribund XB - 70. And now, it is Aurora that does not exist.


"The evidence is now so consistent and so overwhelming that no reasonably intelligent person can deny something unexplained is going on in our atmosphere" Admiral of the Fleet The Lord Hill-Norton
Copyright 2001 by [The Why? Files]. All rights reserved.
Revised: 07 Jun 2003 16:36:53 +0100 .